September 30, 2026 The Dual Mandate in Rural America Governor Lisa D. Cook At the 2026 Investing in Rural America Conference, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Asheville, North Carolina Share --> --> --> --> --> --> Thank you, President Barkin, for that kind introduction. And thank you to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and your partners across the Federal Reserve System for organizing this timely and important conference this year and for the past several years. 1 It is a delight and a privilege to be back in North Carolina where I spent the summers and holidays of my childhood. In fact, the summer after the TV series "Roots" aired, my parents packed my sisters and me up in our lime green station wagon, and we traversed much of the state identifying and meeting our relatives and researching our family's ancestry. This was significantly before we had AI, Google and Ancestry.com searches at our fingertips, and it was a real opportunity to discover rural North Carolina. It is a distinct pleasure to be back here in Asheville, especially at this colorful, beautiful time of year. And the people of Asheville and the rest of western North Carolina remain in my thoughts and prayers as you continue to recover from Hurricane Helene. slide 1 As a Fed Governor, my charge is to set policy that will best achieve maximum employment and stable prices for all Americans, including those of us who live in rural communities. I care about those communities as a policymaker and as an economist, but also as someone who grew up in a small town in central Georgia: Milledgeville. That makes this conference of special interest to me. I know firsthand how hard people in rural areas work, how intensely they care for their families and neighbors, and how much they contribute to their communities and to the entire economy. In turn, it is only appropriate that we have events like this to inform policymakers about how residents of rural areas are experiencing and contributing to the economy. As some of you may know, this is the first year that the scope of the Investing in Rural America conference has been national. It is also the first time that all 12 Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors have partnered to organize and present this conference. Congratulations to the Richmond Fed and the other Reserve Banks for achieving these firsts! The Systemwide commitment to this signature event is an acknowledgment of the importance of rural communities to the national economy and to the Federal Reserve. Rural communities are vital contributors to the U.S. economy. These communities are the source of critical resources to the nation's economy, including food to stock our grocery stores, energy to power our businesses, and materials to build our homes. 2 Rural communities also play vital roles in integrated, regional supply chains, including those for furniture, motor vehicles, electronics, as well as paper, plastics, and rubber products. And I know that across rural America, small businesses in these and other industries play an essential role as employers and innovators. Today, I will take the opportunity to try to address a few key questions about rural areas and the Federal Reserve's analysis of and engagement with them. How are rural communities evolving economically, especially along the dimensions related to our dual mandate related to employment and inflation? How are small businesses faring in the rural economy? Finally, how are staff at the Board and across the System engaged in research and outreach to better understand rural economies? Economic Outlook in Rural Communities In my assessment, rural communities experience labor-market dynamics broadly similar to those in much of the rest of the country, with some important caveats. Nationwide, the labor market is largely stable. Unemployment is low by historical standards, and new claims for unemployment benefits—a proxy for layoffs—continue to trend at low levels. Hiring has been more modest in recent years than earlier in the expansion, though employment gains trended up over the summer months. The roughly 20 million workers in rural communities are an important part of that overall picture. They represent about 1 in 8 American workers. As you can see in Figure 1 , the unemployment rate in rural communities has generally been quite close to the national unemployment rate, with the exception of the pandemic period when it rose less and recovered more quickly. A more notable difference between rural and urban communities can be seen in Figure 2 . Rural communities have a smaller share of adults participating in the labor force. That is partly a demographic story. However, even among workers between 25 and 54 years old, the employment-to-population ratio in rural communities is several points lower. In part, this reflects a lower labor force participation rate among working-age men due to both economic and social factors. 3 Similarly, the pace of job creation in rural communities has been slower than in urban areas. Figure 3 shows total employment indexed to 2019 levels for both rural and urban communities. During the pandemic, job loss was somewhat less severe in rural areas. Then, in the initial phase of the pandemic recovery, job growth was slightly stronger. However, over the past four or so years, job creation has tilted toward urban areas. On the other side of our dual mandate is the inflation picture in rural America. While broadly consistent with national trends, inflation in rural areas also differs in some notable ways. As you can see in Figure 4 , in the year before the pandemic, inflation in rural communities was somewhat lower than in urban areas. That changed considerably during the early part of the pandemic recovery, when the cost of living in rural areas rose even faster than in urban areas. Indeed, several factors are salient, but I will mention two: the increase in energy prices and in housing costs. Energy costs can weigh more heavily on rural communities, partly because the distances traveled for employment and services can be significantly farther. Transportation costs account for about a fourth of all expenses for rural households versus less than a fifth for urban households. 4 In terms of housing costs, during and in the first years after the pandemic, home-price trends deviated from their pattern over previous decades and rose much faster in rural areas and lower-density areas than in cities. Research shows that between March 2020 and March 2023, home values in nonmetro counties, smaller metro areas, and low-density suburbs of large metros rose about 36 percent, compared to just 21 percent in the densest urban counties. 5 This change was driven by an increase in remote work and the desire of many families to have additional space. The rise in home values likely filtered through to put upward pressure on rents in rural and less dense areas as well. Since 2023, housing inflation in rural areas has reverted toward pre-pandemic patterns; however, housing costs remain a significant driver of overall inflation. Another outcome from the pandemic that may be familiar to those of you from Asheville, as well as those from other tourism-dependent rural areas, is a surge in the value of vacation properties and second homes. Research from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies showed that counties with a high share of vacation and second homes saw home prices rise 47 percent in the 3 years after the pandemic. 6 That rise in prices can place pressure on long-time residents and seasonal workers seeking housing in those areas. Regardless of whether you are in a rural or urban area, the fact remains that inflation has been too high for too long. On a national level, it has exceeded the Fed's 2 percent target for more than five years. As you know, I voted along with the rest of the FOMC to raise rates 25 basis points at the recent September meeting. I am committed to returning inflation to our objective while preserving the strength in the labor market. Small Businesses and the Rural Economy One very important element of the rural economy are small businesses and entrepreneurs. This is another topic that is dear to me, as I have long researched the economics of innovation and entrepreneurship. Some 4.3 million small businesses are dotted across rural America, accounting for more than 96 percent of all rural establishments. Those businesses employ 7.4 million people in rural communities. 7 Both research and my firsthand experience show me that rural residents are highly entrepreneurial, with a greater share of people in rural areas than urban ones being self-employed. 8 The Fed's latest Small Business Credit Survey shows that a large share of these small businesses, 30 percent, are less than three years old. That speaks as well to the entrepreneurial spirit in rural America, while also showing a mix of both older, more established small businesses and younger start-ups in rural America. This mix is important, because new businesses account for a disproportionately large share of gross job creation by small businesses. In 2023, the most recent year for which we have data, new firms represented just 9 percent of all small businesses nationwide, but they accounted for 24 percent of job creation. 9 The presence of new, innovative small businesses in rural-communities is consistent with research showing that rural regions. Therefore, many with a higher concentration of innovative businesses demonstrate stronger employment and establishment growth. 10 Fed's Role in Promoting Rural Vitality Now that I have discussed the economy in rural America, I would like to take a moment to highlight the Fed's role in promoting vitality in rural communities. Both at the Board and at each Reserve Bank, staff are dedicated to supporting the economic health of rural communities so that they are vibrant places where small businesses, families, and individuals can grow and thrive. I pay careful atten
