A recently signed oil deal between the US and Venezuela, described by former President Trump as "the biggest oil deal in world history," grants a US-led company 100-year concessions over 17 Venezuelan oilfields, representing over a fifth of the country's proven oil reserves (65 billion barrels). Interim Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez stated the agreement would generate $100 billion in investment and more than $200 billion in tax revenue. However, Elliott Abrams, former special representative for Venezuela, called it a "terrible deal," arguing that Venezuela effectively gave away 20% of its national resources for nothing, possibly under US pressure.

Analysts express skepticism regarding the deal's benefits and timeframe. While Trump suggested profits within two to three years, energy experts warn that the dilapidated state of Venezuela's oil sector means a decade is a more realistic timeline for recovery. Luis Pacheco of the Baker Institute estimates Venezuela needs around $100 billion in investment over eight years to return to its oil production levels of 30 years ago. Concerns are also raised about who will manage these resources, given the country's past mismanagement of its oil wealth.

The deal faces criticism for potentially hindering Venezuela's broader oil sector recovery. By granting North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP) and the US government privileged commercial terms, Washington risks creating a two-tiered market that disadvantages competitors like Chevron. This could deter foreign investment, as companies may question whether future projects will be based on economic merit or political connections, and if the rules could change with leadership shifts. Such market distortions are typically avoided by oil companies considering multi-billion-dollar investments.

Venezuela's oil production plummeted from approximately 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) in the 1990s to about 1 million bpd due to underinvestment, mismanagement, corruption post-nationalization in 2007, and US sanctions. While production is forecast to recover to around 1.5 million bpd within two years and potentially exceed 3 million bpd by 2050 (according to Rystad Energy), rebuilding the necessary infrastructure will require tens of billions of dollars and long-term commitment from multiple international companies. Introducing political uncertainty through this deal could make securing financing more difficult and expensive, potentially slowing down the very recovery it aims to accelerate.

Separately, Venezuela is facing a massive debt restructuring, with an estimated debt pile of around $240 billion, significantly higher than market expectations. This represents a debt-to-GDP ratio of over 200%, stemming from years of economic contraction under former President Nicolás Maduro. The restructuring, aided by Centerview Partners, aims to allow Venezuela to re-enter international markets, though bondholders are concerned about potential "haircuts" on their investments. The International Monetary Fund may eventually be involved, but a successful restructuring is seen as crucial for attracting foreign investors and fostering economic growth and stability in the region.