As nerves fray at the Supreme Court, there is a sentiment among some that collegiality and a "soft touch" are missed, particularly referencing former Justice Stephen Breyer. Breyer, who retired after 28 distinguished years, was known for his ability to foster consensus and maintain civility, even with ideological counterparts like Clarence Thomas. His departure is seen as a loss for the court's interpersonal dynamics, especially now that the institution is grappling with heightened politicization and a significant drop in public confidence, with only one in four Americans expressing high confidence according to a Gallup poll.
Breyer’s approach, described by former clerks and colleagues, emphasized pragmatism and respect for precedent, known as *stare decisis*, even when faced with significant disagreements. He was often seen as a "statesman" and the "glue" that kept the court unified. His replacement, Ketanji Brown Jackson, is highly regarded and expected to align with the progressive bloc, but it's anticipated to take time for her to cultivate Breyer's unique personal touch within the court.
The current environment of the Supreme Court, following decisions overturning abortion rights and rejecting a gun control law, further highlights the void Breyer left. His belief that the High Court was not overly politicized has been challenged by recent events. His legacy, built on working across the aisle and valuing compromise, stands in stark contrast to the court's present-day struggles with deep partisan divides.
